Luz pulsada intensa combinada con expresión de las glándulas de Meibomio para el tratamiento del chalación / Intense pulsed light combined with meibomian gland expression for chalazion management

Objetivo Investigar la eficacia y la seguridad del protocolo de luz pulsada intensa (IPL) combinando el protocolo de tratamiento con IPL para la disfunción de las glándulas de Meibomio/enfermedad de ojo seco con IPL aplicada directamente en los párpados, asociada a la expresión de las glándulas de Meibomio (GM) para el tratamiento del chalación. Material y métodos Estudio retrospectivo de serie de casos. Los pacientes que presentaron chalación, recibieron un tratamiento combinado de terapia con IPL que consistió en usar el protocolo habitual de IPL para disfunción de las glándulas de Meibomio/enfermedad de ojo seco empleando una fluencia de acuerdo al tipo de piel según Fitzpatrick, seguido de una segunda fase (en la misma sesión) de aplicación IPL directamente sobre los párpados de ambos ojos empleando una fluencia de 10J/cm2. A continuación, todos los pacientes recibieron expresión de las GM, higiene de los párpados, antibiótico tópico y medicación ocular antiinflamatoria tópica. Los efectos adversos relacionados con este protocolo se evaluaron en cada sesión de IPL. Resultados Se incluyeron 26 chalaciones de diecinueve pacientes (24 ojos) con una edad media de 49,89±20,43 años. Fueron necesarias 2,07±0,97 sesiones de IPL de media para la resolución del chalación. El tratamiento combinado de protocolo IPL y expresión de GM mostró un 96,15% de eficacia y no se observaron efectos adversos. Conclusiones El tratamiento combinado de IPL para disfunción de las glándulas de Meibomio/enfermedad de ojo seco con IPL aplicado directamente sobre los párpados y expresión de GM podría ser eficaz y seguro para el tratamiento de los chalaciones (AU)

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of an intense pulsed light (IPL) combined IPL treatment protocol for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)/dry eye disease (DED) with IPL applied directly to the eyelids, associated with meibomian gland (MG) expression for the treatment of chalazion. Material and Methods Retrospective case series study. Patients presenting with chalazion received a combined IPL therapy treatment consisting of using the usual IPL protocol for DGM/EOS using a fluence according to skin type according to Fitzpatrick, followed by a second phase (in the same session) of IPL application directly on the eyelids of both eyes using a fluence of 10 J/cm2. All patients then received GM expression, eyelid hygiene, topical antibiotic and topical ocular anti-inflammatory medication. Adverse effects related to this protocol were assessed at each IPL session. Results Twenty-six chalazions from nineteen patients (24 eyes) with a mean age of 49.89 ± 20.43 years were included. An average of 2.07 ± 0.97 IPL sessions were required for chalazion resolution. The combined treatment of IPL protocol and GM expression showed 96.15% efficacy and no adverse effects were observed. Conclusions Combined IPL treatment for DGM/EOS with IPL applied directly on the eyelids and GM expression could be effective and safe for the treatment of chalazions (AU)

Intense pulsed light combined with meibomian gland expression for chalazion management.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of an intense pulsed light (IPL) combined IPL treatment protocol for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)/dry eye disease (DED) with IPL applied directly to the eyelids, associated with meibomian gland (MG) expression for the treatment of chalazion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective case series study. Patients presenting with chalazion received a combined IPL therapy treatment consisting of using the usual IPL protocol for DGM/EOS using a fluence according to skin type according to Fitzpatrick, followed by a second phase (in the same session) of IPL application directly on the eyelids of both eyes using a fluence of 10J/cm2. All patients then received GM expression, eyelid hygiene, topical antibiotic and topical ocular anti-inflammatory medication. Adverse effects related to this protocol were assessed at each IPL session. RESULTS: Twenty-six chalazions from nineteen patients (24 eyes) with a mean age of 49.89±20.43 years were included. An average of 2.07±0.97 IPL sessions were required for chalazion resolution. The combined treatment of IPL protocol and GM expression showed 96.15% efficacy and no adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Combined IPL treatment for MGD/DED with IPL applied directly onto the eyelids and MGX could be effective and safe for the management of chalazions.